Party boss, hospital & insurance exec, and now activist: George Norcross goes all in on ed reform
Posted on June 20, 2011 by Jane Roh
Chris Christie, Christopher Cern, and George Norcross: Perfect together?
And turns South Jersey politics on its ear in the process.
In an email last Friday to his colleagues at Conner Strong & Buckelew and Cooper
University Hospital, of which I’ve obtained a copy, George Norcross explained
his decision to jump into the highly emotional public schools reform debate.
By now, you may have seen the multi-million dollar smear campaign and guerilla
tactics funded by the New Jersey teachers union. They’ve attacked Governor
Christie, State Senator Sweeney, me and many other champions of real education
reform. Since my name has appeared frequently, as has the company’s, I want to
give everyone some context.
Let’s be clear: the union isn’t fighting for taxpayers, nor for quality
education at a reasonable cost. The unions are hell bent on protecting their
coveted status quo. They want guaranteed job security and benefits for free. You
know that model won’t work.
You could say the unions have made this personal. And, as a proud public school
parent, it is personal. For too long, New Jersey has had a broken system — poor
performing schools, higher taxes and an unprepared workforce. As a longtime
champion of Cooper Hospital, I’ve seen the harm caused by a bad system. Strong,
vibrant communities can only be built on a foundation of high-quality schools.
For decades, the New Jersey teachers unions have been a bully on the playground,
knocking anyone over who got in their way. Today, there are too many people to
knock over – largely because good ideas have a way of surviving. There’s a long
and growing list of people bringing meaningful change and best practices to
public education. My name is on it, along with many respected leaders from every
corner of New Jersey.
Please know that despite the rhetoric from the unions, the outcome of this
debate has no real bearing on our business, one way or another. We are, and will
always be, secure, stable and successful.
I hope you respect my decision to stand and fight for this important issue. I,
personally, invite you to call me directly with any specific questions.
Norcross has not been this public a political figure since he stepped down as
Camden County Democratic Committee chairman in 1994. He’s been on the receiving
end of some unflattering press in the time since, which resulted in a combative
relationship with reporters.
By his own admission, retreating from public view over the past 17 years allowed
the Norcross mythology to perpetuate. His name pops up everywhere, from
municipal council meetings to county freeholder board hearings.
In Democratic-controlled Camden County, paranoia about Norcross is particularly
intense. I’ve been on the phone with Republicans who’ve asked me if the
Courier-Post phone lines have been tapped by the Norcross machine. Republicans
also whisper about police departments being in Norcross’s pocket, resulting in
the always-sage advice not to drive drunk lest one of those cops is tailing you.
While the Norcross mythology has largely been a unifying force among scattered
Republican organizations in South Jersey, it also has proved a destructive one.
Unhappy with its permanent minority status and weirdly fixated on his wife’s job
at Cooper Hospital, disgruntled CCGOPers launched an incredibly nasty,
below-board campaign that forced Rick DeMichele to resign as chairman earlier
this year.
Stuff like that not only scares away prospective candidates, it also diminishes
the party’s credibility. Anybody who thought for a second Norcross was remotely
aware DeMichele’s wife was an attorney for Cooper is just not living in reality.
Norcross has been hinting for weeks he’s going all in on the schools reform
debate. This email appears to confirm that
he will continue to be public on this, whispering campaigns about what’s in it
for him be damned. (I’m waiting to hear from him.)
The Christie-Norcross-Joe D alliance has been confusing for South Jersey
Republicans to watch. See this overwrought post at conservative blog Save Jersey
and the 5thLD Republican candidates’ strategy of courting public workers in
their campaign against Democrats Donald Norcross, Gilbert “Whip” Wilson and
Angel Fuentes.
“We in Camden County have long been aware of the pervasive patronage that exists
between the South Jersey Democrat Machine and their political benefactor, George
Norcross III,” said GOP Senate Assembly candidate Wil Levins, when I asked him
to comment on the NJEA ad attacking Norcross.
“Whether or not individuals support unions, the undeniable defense of rights,
specified here with collective bargaining rights, must be upheld. Any mechanism
of government that denies individuals their rights, both personal and economic,
must be confronted.”
And on the countywide police and fire consolidation plan backed by Camden County
Democrats and Gov. Chris Christie: “(The) plan has all the trappings of a public
sleight-of-hand, policemen’s union busting, consolidating political power and
another taxpayer bail-out of Camden City.
“I am proud of our county’s police chiefs for standing up against the Freeholder
Board’s attempt to hastily force a poorly designed and ineffective countywide
police service plan on the people of Camden County.”
That sound like a Christie Republican to you?
Bottom line, purity tests are for Nazis (like the one a union leader compared
Christie to the other day, *cough*). During an impromptu press conference with
reporters, Norcross called Christie’s Medicaid waiver proposal “draconian.” Does
that mean they can’t agree on anything else?
Per colleague Michael Diamond, the private sector lost 153,700 jobs over the
last decade while local governments gained nearly 77,000 jobs. That’s
contributed to the property tax crush on Garden Staters, which has led to
bipartisan agreement that consolidation (read: personnel reduction) is the
solution.
Only no town or county ever wants to go first. So we have the
Christie-Sweeney-Norcross plan to create a countywide police and fire service in
Camden County, aka allowing municipalities to break existing contracts with
employees and start fresh.
There’s one potentially hot legislative race that I won’t identify just yet in
which both candidates are deeply plugged into taxpayer dollars. The strategy in
both camps: paint the other guy as the bigger pig.
That is an absurd situation to be in, and it’s the norm throughout the state.
For taxpayers to feel actual, quantifiable relief, the system as it currently
exists needs to see a dramatic makeover. And that means both parties will eat
some of their own.
A few more questions:
1. The NJEA already has gone after Norcross in a TV ad campaign. Do they try to
go after Conner Strong and Cooper as well? And do they actually endorse the
Republicans running against Donald Norcross’s slate?
2. How does this affect the younger Norcross? The 5th LD is safe as houses for
Dems, but the risk here is it reinforces impressions he is not his own man.
Notice that Donald was not in attendance during George’s recent public
appearances, including two in Camden.
3. Where on earth do public employees go now? At Rutgers-Eagleton’s Morning
After panel June 8, outgoing Assemblywoman Joan Quigley, D-Hudson, said the
unions have been threatening to throw their support behind Republicans.
Republicans are generally outmanned, outfunded and outstrategized in Camden and
Gloucester counties. Support from public employee unions could change that.
4. Talking to Ds and Rs behind the scenes it’s clear rank-and-file workers could
have gotten a much better deal had their leadership shown more flexibility.
Under Christie, the unions see themselves in an existential fight, but must they
take modest wage-earning members with them? Liberal Democrats are increasingly
publicly furious with the leadership.
I Tweeted this before so I may as well say it here: If Marie Corfield, the
Democratic Assembly candidate in LD16, were the face of the NJEA, public
educators would be in a much better place right now. You have to wonder how much
of the bleeding workers will soon see could have been staunched under different
leadership.